Greater
Metropolitan Planning
Organization
Technical Advisory
Committee
1st Floor Conference Room of the
MINUTES:
I.
Attendance:
The meeting
began at
II.
Public Comments
There were no
public comments at this time.
III.
Housekeeping
No issues were
presented at this time.
IV.
Regional Transportation Plan – Phase II
A meeting will
be held on
Two primary
goals for today’s meeting are to: 1) reduce the number of projects list into 1
or 2 potential improvements and 2) provide a generalized priority list of the
projects. Also, during the first round
of the screening it was suggested that the members should come up with some
ideas about the vision of
The second phase
of screening developed a scoring system for the environmental, social, and
engineering impacts. Zero points
reflected poorly and 6 points reflected positively. These are the criteria that have been
applied to establish the overall rankings of the projects. Bill
Troe informed the group that all criteria carry the same weight at this time. Bill’s recommendation for weighting of the
criteria is to keep them all the same.
Bill encourages
the members to look for adjustments that need to be made to the scoring
criteria. He wants the members to start
providing input on the particular projects and the specifics of the matrix. Chet advises the group to start with the
first column for each project and determine if they are scored
accordingly. Ed Sneckenberger asks where
URS obtained the numbers. Bill responds
that the numbers were documented in the information that was provided in the
Phase I screening.
Zane Schuck is interested in what Bill would perceive to be the
major skeletal transportation network.
He believes that URS should be looking at the necessary components that put the skeleton
together which in turn, would influence many of the numbers in the matrix. Chet states that once we get to a point
where we have all the components identified, he believes that some projects
will be quickly eliminated because they won’t be beneficial to the overall
system.
Monty Warner
commends the MPO and URS for identifying the corridors that create the large
scale projects. He was wondering if
there is a way to preserve the skeletal network for future development when
funding is available so that if
URS’ next role
is to establish a system that can be funded.
Bill will be assembling packages together that will incorporate as many
of the higher scoring projects as possible and still remain around 200 million
dollar range.
Bill suggests
that the members spend some time reviewing the matrix and respond to him via
email about what they perceive the numbers to be.
V.
Next Meeting
The next meeting
of the TAC will be held on
VI.
Adjournment
The meeting
adjourned at